The session interval as the unit
The record is organised by the stretch between one confirmed session and the next, rather than by a rolling window — so "between sessions" is a defined period, not an approximation.
For researchers
The course of therapy, kept as a record
Most of mental health happens between appointments, in the hours research has always struggled to see — and what does get recorded rarely stays attributable to whoever recorded it. Healing Space UK structures exactly that territory.
What the platform structures
Between-session life, captured as it happens rather than reconstructed a week later — and kept attributable afterwards.
Sources kept distinct
Patient reports, clinician records, agreed goals, recorded measures and patient-reported usefulness stay attributable to their origin, each with its date and a link to the original entry.
Retrieval without inference
Counting and comparison over what was actually recorded. No embeddings, no similarity matching, and no inferred recurrence across separate free-text entries — those were deliberately not built.
Change recorded, not overwritten
Treatment-plan goal history is append-only and enforced in the database, so what was agreed and when it changed is reconstructable rather than remembered.
Patient-reported experience
Whether something helped is answered by the patient, in their name, against a specific piece of work — rather than inferred from engagement.
Disclosure as a first-class fact
What the patient chose to share is distinguishable from what they kept private, and privacy is enforced rather than assumed — including for answers attached to unshared items.
Provenance of a governed capture
Where a structured item originates from conversation, a language model may propose it, deterministic logic validates it against the patient’s own message, and the patient confirms it before it is written — with that proposal and decision kept as a private provenance record. Model output is never the authority for a structured value. This path is in development and described as such.
Where we honestly are
We will not claim outcomes we have not measured — including the central one: whether preserving this kind of context improves therapy at all. Two further questions we take seriously: whether support of this kind strengthens skills and independence rather than creating reliance, and whether therapeutic continuity can safely outlast a single care relationship. All three are research questions, not product claims.
No published trials yet
There is no published evidence for this platform today, and we do not pretend otherwise anywhere on this site.
Evaluation on the roadmap
Structured evaluation is planned and stated publicly in the platform guide, with its honest current status. We are currently speaking with practising therapists about where the approach is most useful; that is scoping, not evidence.
Consent before research use
Any research use of patient data would require explicit consent and appropriate approvals. None is in place today, and nothing is collected for research by default.
One platform, seen from four sides
The same intervention, described for the people who use it differently.
Working with us
If you study digital support between therapy sessions, we would like to talk — including about the study designs that would prove us wrong.